Equatorial Guinea vs Kyrgyzstan: Women's universal right to vote
Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.
Across all 126 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1960s | 0.2 | 1 | 0.8 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Equatorial Guinea or Kyrgyzstan?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Equatorial Guinea and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kyrgyzstan?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.