Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Women's universal right to vote
Ecuador
1
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan
1
in 2025
Ecuador rank
1st
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1 against 1 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.
Across all 158 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1960s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1970s | 0.2 | 1 | 0.8 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Ecuador, at 1 against 1 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Ecuador ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.