Dominican Republic vs Taiwan: Women's universal right to vote
Dominican Republic
1
in 2025
Taiwan
1
in 2025
Dominican Republic rank
1st
Taiwan rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Dominican Republic
- Taiwan
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 1 against 1 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 131 shared years of data; in 1895 it was Taiwan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Taiwan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.5 | Dominican Republic |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Dominican Republic or Taiwan?
- Dominican Republic, at 1 against 1 in Taiwan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Dominican Republic and Taiwan?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Taiwan?
- 131 years are reported by both, from 1895 to 2025.
- How do Dominican Republic and Taiwan rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.