Côte d'Ivoire vs Kazakhstan: Women's universal right to vote
Côte d'Ivoire
1
in 2025
Kazakhstan
1
in 2025
Côte d'Ivoire rank
1st
Kazakhstan rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 1 against 1 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.
Across all 133 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Kazakhstan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Kazakhstan |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Kazakhstan |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Kazakhstan |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Kazakhstan |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | Kazakhstan |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Côte d'Ivoire or Kazakhstan?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 1 against 1 in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Côte d'Ivoire and Kazakhstan?
- 0, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Kazakhstan?
- 133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Kazakhstan rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Kazakhstan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.