Costa Rica vs Syrian Arab Republic: Women's universal right to vote
Costa Rica
1
in 2025
Syrian Arab Republic
1
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
1st
Syrian Arab Republic rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Costa Rica
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 1 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | Costa Rica |
| 1950s | 1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | Costa Rica |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Costa Rica or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Costa Rica, at 1 against 1 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Costa Rica and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Costa Rica and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Costa Rica ranks 1st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.