Costa Rica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Women's universal right to vote
Costa Rica
1
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Costa Rica
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 89 shared years of data; in 1937 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | Costa Rica |
| 1950s | 1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | Costa Rica |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Costa Rica or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Costa Rica, at 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Costa Rica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2025.
- How do Costa Rica and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Costa Rica ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.