Congo vs Netherlands: Women's universal right to vote

Congo
1
in 2025
Netherlands
1
in 2025
Congo rank
1st
Netherlands rank
1st

Women's universal right to vote over time

  • Congo
  • Netherlands
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Congo currently reports 1 against 1 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.

Across all 144 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Netherlands Difference Ahead
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0.8 0.8 Netherlands
1930s 0 1 1 Netherlands
1940s 0 1 1 Netherlands
1950s 0.3 1 0.7 Netherlands
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Congo or Netherlands?
Congo, at 1 against 1 in Netherlands as of 2025.
What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Congo and Netherlands?
0, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Netherlands?
144 years are reported by both, from 1882 to 2025.
How do Congo and Netherlands rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
Congo ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Women's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.