Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Women's universal right to vote
Congo
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
Congo rank
1st
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Congo
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1 against 1 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Congo ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Congo |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | Congo |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
- Congo, at 1 against 1 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Congo ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.