Comoros vs Mauritius: Women's universal right to vote

Comoros
1
in 2025
Mauritius
1
in 2025
Comoros rank
1st
Mauritius rank
1st

Women's universal right to vote over time

  • Comoros
  • Mauritius
00.20.40.60.81188519552025

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 1 against 1 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 109 shared years of data; in 1886 it was Mauritius ahead.

Comoros ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Mauritius Difference Ahead
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0.3 0.1 0.2 Comoros
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Comoros or Mauritius?
Comoros, at 1 against 1 in Mauritius as of 2025.
What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Comoros and Mauritius?
0, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Mauritius?
109 years are reported by both, from 1886 to 2025.
How do Comoros and Mauritius rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
Comoros ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Women's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.