Central African Republic vs Mauritania: Women's universal right to vote
Central African Republic
1
in 2025
Mauritania
1
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
1st
Mauritania rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Central African Republic
- Mauritania
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 1 against 1 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.
Across all 122 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 1st and Mauritania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Central African Republic or Mauritania?
- Central African Republic, at 1 against 1 in Mauritania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Central African Republic and Mauritania?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mauritania?
- 122 years are reported by both, from 1904 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Mauritania rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Central African Republic ranks 1st and Mauritania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.