Central African Republic vs Ghana: Women's universal right to vote
Central African Republic
1
in 2025
Ghana
1
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
1st
Ghana rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Central African Republic
- Ghana
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 1 against 1 in Ghana, a difference of 0.
Across all 124 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 1st and Ghana ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.6 | Ghana |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Central African Republic or Ghana?
- Central African Republic, at 1 against 1 in Ghana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Central African Republic and Ghana?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Ghana?
- 124 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Ghana rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Central African Republic ranks 1st and Ghana ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.