Burkina Faso vs Central African Republic: Women's universal right to vote
Burkina Faso
1
in 2025
Central African Republic
1
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
1st
Central African Republic rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Burkina Faso
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 1 against 1 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 92 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 1st and Central African Republic ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Burkina Faso or Central African Republic?
- Burkina Faso, at 1 against 1 in Central African Republic as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Burkina Faso and Central African Republic?
- 0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Central African Republic?
- 92 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 2025.
- How do Burkina Faso and Central African Republic rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Burkina Faso ranks 1st and Central African Republic ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.