Brazil vs Libya: Women's universal right to vote

Brazil
1
in 2025
Libya
1
in 2025
Brazil rank
1st
Libya rank
1st

Women's universal right to vote over time

  • Brazil
  • Libya
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 1 against 1 in Libya, a difference of 0.

Across all 231 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 1st and Libya ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 24 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Libya Difference Ahead
1790s 0 0 0
1800s 0 0 0
1810s 0 0 0
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0 0 0
1960s 0 0.6 0.6 Libya
1970s 0 1 1 Libya
1980s 0.5 1 0.5 Libya
1990s 1 1 0
2000s 1 1 0
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Brazil or Libya?
Brazil, at 1 against 1 in Libya as of 2025.
What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Brazil and Libya?
0, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Libya?
231 years are reported by both, from 1795 to 2025.
How do Brazil and Libya rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
Brazil ranks 1st and Libya ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Women's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.