Botswana vs Mauritius: Women's universal right to vote

Botswana
1
in 2025
Mauritius
1
in 2025
Botswana rank
1st
Mauritius rank
1st

Women's universal right to vote over time

  • Botswana
  • Mauritius
00.20.40.60.81188519552025

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 1 against 1 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.

Across all 141 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Mauritius Difference Ahead
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0.1 0.1 Mauritius
1960s 0.9 1 0.1 Mauritius
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Botswana or Mauritius?
Botswana, at 1 against 1 in Mauritius as of 2025.
What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Botswana and Mauritius?
0, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mauritius?
141 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2025.
How do Botswana and Mauritius rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
Botswana ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Women's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.