Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Viet Nam: Women's universal right to vote
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1
in 2025
Viet Nam
1
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
Viet Nam rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1 against 1 in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 86 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Viet Nam?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1 against 1 in Viet Nam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Viet Nam?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Viet Nam?
- 86 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Viet Nam rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.