Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Palau: Women's universal right to vote
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1
in 2025
Palau
1
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
Palau rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Palau
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1 against 1 in Palau, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 79 shared years of data; in 1947 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Palau ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Palau?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1 against 1 in Palau as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Palau?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Palau?
- 79 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Palau rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Palau ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.