Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mongolia: Women's universal right to vote
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1
in 2025
Mongolia
1
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
Mongolia rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Mongolia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1 against 1 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.
Across all 108 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Mongolia |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mongolia |
| 1940s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Mongolia |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Mongolia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1 against 1 in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolia?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolia?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolia rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.