Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Iceland: Women's universal right to vote
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1
in 2025
Iceland
1
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
Iceland rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Iceland
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1 against 1 in Iceland, a difference of 0.
Across all 108 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Iceland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Iceland |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Iceland |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Iceland |
| 1940s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Iceland |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Iceland?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1 against 1 in Iceland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Iceland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.