Belgium vs Libya: Women's universal right to vote

Belgium
1
in 2025
Libya
1
in 2025
Belgium rank
1st
Libya rank
1st

Women's universal right to vote over time

  • Belgium
  • Libya
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 1 against 1 in Libya, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 197 shared years of data; in 1795 it was Libya ahead.

Belgium ranks 1st and Libya ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 21 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Libya Difference Ahead
1790s 0 0 0 β€”
1830s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0.1 0 0.1 Belgium
1950s 1 0 1 Belgium
1960s 1 0.6 0.4 Belgium
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Belgium or Libya?
Belgium, at 1 against 1 in Libya as of 2025.
What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Belgium and Libya?
0, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Libya?
197 years are reported by both, from 1795 to 2025.
How do Belgium and Libya rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
Belgium ranks 1st and Libya ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Women's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.