Barbados vs Kuwait: Women's universal right to vote
Barbados
1
in 2025
Kuwait
1
in 2025
Barbados rank
1st
Kuwait rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Barbados
- Kuwait
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 1 against 1 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 187 shared years of data; in 1839 it was Kuwait ahead.
Barbados ranks 1st and Kuwait ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Barbados |
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Barbados |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Barbados |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Barbados |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Barbados |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Barbados or Kuwait?
- Barbados, at 1 against 1 in Kuwait as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Barbados and Kuwait?
- 0, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Kuwait?
- 187 years are reported by both, from 1839 to 2025.
- How do Barbados and Kuwait rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Barbados ranks 1st and Kuwait ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.