Bangladesh vs Korea, Democratic People's Republic of: Women's universal right to vote
Bangladesh
1
in 2025
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
1
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
1st
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Bangladesh
- Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 1 against 1 in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 55 years both countries report, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 1st and Korea, Democratic People's Republic of ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Bangladesh or Korea, Democratic People's Republic of?
- Bangladesh, at 1 against 1 in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Bangladesh and Korea, Democratic People's Republic of?
- 0, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Korea, Democratic People's Republic of?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
- How do Bangladesh and Korea, Democratic People's Republic of rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Bangladesh ranks 1st and Korea, Democratic People's Republic of ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.