Azerbaijan vs Côte d'Ivoire: Women's universal right to vote
Azerbaijan
1
in 2025
Côte d'Ivoire
1
in 2025
Azerbaijan rank
1st
Côte d'Ivoire rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Azerbaijan
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 1 against 1 in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 133 shared years of data; in 1893 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 1st and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Azerbaijan |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Azerbaijan |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Azerbaijan |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Azerbaijan |
| 1950s | 1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | Azerbaijan |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Azerbaijan or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Azerbaijan, at 1 against 1 in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Azerbaijan and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Azerbaijan and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Azerbaijan ranks 1st and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.