Austria vs Libya: Women's universal right to vote

Austria
1
in 2025
Libya
1
in 2025
Austria rank
1st
Libya rank
1st

Women's universal right to vote over time

  • Austria
  • Libya
00.20.40.60.81179519102025

How they compare

Austria currently reports 1 against 1 in Libya, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 159 shared years of data; in 1867 it was Libya ahead.

Austria ranks 1st and Libya ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Libya Difference Ahead
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0.2 0 0.2 Austria
1920s 1 0 1 Austria
1930s 1 0 1 Austria
1940s 1 0 1 Austria
1950s 1 0 1 Austria
1960s 1 0.6 0.4 Austria
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Austria or Libya?
Austria, at 1 against 1 in Libya as of 2025.
What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Austria and Libya?
0, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Libya?
159 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2025.
How do Austria and Libya rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
Austria ranks 1st and Libya ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Women's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.