Austria vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Women's universal right to vote
Austria
1
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1
in 2025
Austria rank
1st
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Austria
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Austria currently reports 1 against 1 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 1st and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Austria |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Austria |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Austria |
| 1940s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Austria |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Austria or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Austria, at 1 against 1 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Austria and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Austria and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Austria ranks 1st and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.