Australia vs Rwanda: Universal suffrage women lexical

Australia
1
in 2025
Rwanda
1
in 2025
Australia rank
1st
Rwanda rank
1st

Universal suffrage women lexical over time

  • Australia
  • Rwanda
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1 against 1 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1910s 1 0 1 Australia
1920s 1 0 1 Australia
1930s 1 0 1 Australia
1940s 1 0 1 Australia
1950s 1 0 1 Australia
1960s 1 0.9 0.1 Australia
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher universal suffrage women lexical, Australia or Rwanda?
Australia, at 1 against 1 in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in universal suffrage women lexical between Australia and Rwanda?
0, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Rwanda?
110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
How do Australia and Rwanda rank globally for universal suffrage women lexical?
Australia ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Universal suffrage women lexical. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Universal suffrage women lexical
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed