Armenia vs Central African Republic: Women's universal right to vote
Armenia
1
in 2025
Central African Republic
1
in 2025
Armenia rank
1st
Central African Republic rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Armenia
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 1 against 1 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 1st and Central African Republic ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Armenia |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Armenia |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Armenia |
| 1950s | 1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | Armenia |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Armenia or Central African Republic?
- Armenia, at 1 against 1 in Central African Republic as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Armenia and Central African Republic?
- 0, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Central African Republic?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Armenia and Central African Republic rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Armenia ranks 1st and Central African Republic ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.