Antigua and Barbuda vs Papua New Guinea: Women's universal right to vote
Antigua and Barbuda
1
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
1
in 2025
Antigua and Barbuda rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 1 against 1 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Antigua and Barbuda or Papua New Guinea?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 1 against 1 in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Antigua and Barbuda and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Papua New Guinea?
- 75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Papua New Guinea rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.