Andorra vs Libya: Women's universal right to vote
Andorra
1
in 2025
Libya
1
in 2025
Andorra rank
1st
Libya rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Andorra
- Libya
How they compare
Andorra currently reports 1 against 1 in Libya, a difference of 0.
Across all 212 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Andorra ranks 1st and Libya ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 22 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Andorra | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Libya |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Andorra or Libya?
- Andorra, at 1 against 1 in Libya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Andorra and Libya?
- 0, with Andorra ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Andorra and Libya?
- 212 years are reported by both, from 1814 to 2025.
- How do Andorra and Libya rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Andorra ranks 1st and Libya ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.