Afghanistan vs North Macedonia: Women's universal right to vote
Afghanistan
1
in 2025
North Macedonia
1
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st
Women's universal right to vote over time
- Afghanistan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 1 against 1 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
Across all 108 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | North Macedonia |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | North Macedonia |
| 1960s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | North Macedonia |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher women's universal right to vote, Afghanistan or North Macedonia?
- Afghanistan, at 1 against 1 in North Macedonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in women's universal right to vote between Afghanistan and North Macedonia?
- 0, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and North Macedonia?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Afghanistan and North Macedonia rank globally for women's universal right to vote?
- Afghanistan ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Women's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all women are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.