Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height

Papua New Guinea
126.64 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Zimbabwe
125.2 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
123rd
Zimbabwe rank
124th

Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
255075100125150196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 126.64 kilocalories per day per capita against 125.2 kilocalories per day per capita in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.44 kilocalories per day per capita.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 123rd and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 192 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 145.7 kilocalories per day per capita 114.98 kilocalories per day per capita 30.72 kilocalories per day per capita Papua New Guinea
2020s 127.23 kilocalories per day per capita 122.4 kilocalories per day per capita 4.83 kilocalories per day per capita Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Papua New Guinea, at 126.64 kilocalories per day per capita against 125.2 kilocalories per day per capita in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
1.44 kilocalories per day per capita, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height?
Papua New Guinea ranks 123rd and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-calories-from-animal-protein-vs-mean-male-height/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-calories-from-animal-protein-vs-mean-male-height/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height
Unit
kilocalories per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Daily calorie supply of animal protein includes protein sources from animal-based foods including meat, dairy and seafood products. This is shown against mean male height in adults by year of birth.