Mauritius vs Panama: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height

Mauritius
211.04 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Panama
209.56 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Mauritius rank
79th
Panama rank
80th

Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height over time

  • Mauritius
  • Panama
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 211.04 kilocalories per day per capita against 209.56 kilocalories per day per capita in Panama, a difference of 1.48 kilocalories per day per capita.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Mauritius ranks 79th and Panama ranks 80th of 192 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 50.09 kilocalories per day per capita 90.85 kilocalories per day per capita 40.76 kilocalories per day per capita Panama
1970s 69.8 kilocalories per day per capita 119.15 kilocalories per day per capita 49.35 kilocalories per day per capita Panama
1980s 86.84 kilocalories per day per capita 126.97 kilocalories per day per capita 40.13 kilocalories per day per capita Panama
1990s 112.35 kilocalories per day per capita 133.77 kilocalories per day per capita 21.42 kilocalories per day per capita Panama
2000s 140.19 kilocalories per day per capita 148.8 kilocalories per day per capita 8.62 kilocalories per day per capita Panama
2010s 178.75 kilocalories per day per capita 192.92 kilocalories per day per capita 14.16 kilocalories per day per capita Panama
2020s 198.34 kilocalories per day per capita 215.42 kilocalories per day per capita 17.08 kilocalories per day per capita Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height, Mauritius or Panama?
Mauritius, at 211.04 kilocalories per day per capita against 209.56 kilocalories per day per capita in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height between Mauritius and Panama?
1.48 kilocalories per day per capita, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Panama rank globally for total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height?
Mauritius ranks 79th and Panama ranks 80th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Panama: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-calories-from-animal-protein-vs-mean-male-height/mauritius/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-calories-from-animal-protein-vs-mean-male-height/mauritius/panama/">Mauritius vs Panama: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height
Unit
kilocalories per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Daily calorie supply of animal protein includes protein sources from animal-based foods including meat, dairy and seafood products. This is shown against mean male height in adults by year of birth.