North Korea vs Zambia: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height

North Korea
47.08 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2018
Zambia
53.2 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
North Korea rank
178th
Zambia rank
175th

Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height over time

  • North Korea
  • Zambia
20406080196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 53.2 kilocalories per day per capita against 47.08 kilocalories per day per capita in North Korea, a difference of 6.12 kilocalories per day per capita.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times North Korea's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was North Korea ahead.

North Korea ranks 178th and Zambia ranks 175th of 192 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, North Korea averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Korea Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 48.68 kilocalories per day per capita 48.71 kilocalories per day per capita 0.0306 kilocalories per day per capita Zambia
1970s 59.43 kilocalories per day per capita 53.21 kilocalories per day per capita 6.23 kilocalories per day per capita North Korea
1980s 74.11 kilocalories per day per capita 40.21 kilocalories per day per capita 33.9 kilocalories per day per capita North Korea
1990s 40.12 kilocalories per day per capita 41.22 kilocalories per day per capita 1.11 kilocalories per day per capita Zambia
2000s 38.01 kilocalories per day per capita 37.06 kilocalories per day per capita 0.954 kilocalories per day per capita North Korea
2010s 45.67 kilocalories per day per capita 55.17 kilocalories per day per capita 9.5 kilocalories per day per capita Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height, North Korea or Zambia?
Zambia, at 53.2 kilocalories per day per capita against 47.08 kilocalories per day per capita in North Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height between North Korea and Zambia?
6.12 kilocalories per day per capita, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and Zambia?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2018.
How do North Korea and Zambia rank globally for total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height?
North Korea ranks 178th and Zambia ranks 175th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Korea vs Zambia: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-calories-from-animal-protein-vs-mean-male-height/korea-dem-people-s-rep/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-calories-from-animal-protein-vs-mean-male-height/korea-dem-people-s-rep/zambia/">North Korea vs Zambia: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height
Unit
kilocalories per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Daily calorie supply of animal protein includes protein sources from animal-based foods including meat, dairy and seafood products. This is shown against mean male height in adults by year of birth.