Congo vs Guatemala: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height

Congo
139.2 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Guatemala
135.92 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Congo rank
115th
Guatemala rank
118th

Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height over time

  • Congo
  • Guatemala
5075100125150196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 139.2 kilocalories per day per capita against 135.92 kilocalories per day per capita in Guatemala, a difference of 3.28 kilocalories per day per capita.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 115th and Guatemala ranks 118th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Guatemala in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 52.33 kilocalories per day per capita 44.55 kilocalories per day per capita 7.78 kilocalories per day per capita Congo
1970s 49.63 kilocalories per day per capita 43.31 kilocalories per day per capita 6.32 kilocalories per day per capita Congo
1980s 69.46 kilocalories per day per capita 40.64 kilocalories per day per capita 28.82 kilocalories per day per capita Congo
1990s 66.87 kilocalories per day per capita 48.63 kilocalories per day per capita 18.24 kilocalories per day per capita Congo
2000s 63.86 kilocalories per day per capita 67.97 kilocalories per day per capita 4.11 kilocalories per day per capita Guatemala
2010s 88.96 kilocalories per day per capita 101.87 kilocalories per day per capita 12.91 kilocalories per day per capita Guatemala
2020s 121.86 kilocalories per day per capita 123.49 kilocalories per day per capita 1.63 kilocalories per day per capita Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height, Congo or Guatemala?
Congo, at 139.2 kilocalories per day per capita against 135.92 kilocalories per day per capita in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height between Congo and Guatemala?
3.28 kilocalories per day per capita, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Guatemala rank globally for total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height?
Congo ranks 115th and Guatemala ranks 118th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Guatemala: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-calories-from-animal-protein-vs-mean-male-height/congo-rep/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-calories-from-animal-protein-vs-mean-male-height/congo-rep/guatemala/">Congo vs Guatemala: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height
Unit
kilocalories per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Daily calorie supply of animal protein includes protein sources from animal-based foods including meat, dairy and seafood products. This is shown against mean male height in adults by year of birth.