Cambodia vs Namibia: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height

Cambodia
87.56 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Namibia
84.2 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Cambodia rank
144th
Namibia rank
147th

Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height over time

  • Cambodia
  • Namibia
255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 87.56 kilocalories per day per capita against 84.2 kilocalories per day per capita in Namibia, a difference of 3.36 kilocalories per day per capita.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 144th and Namibia ranks 147th of 192 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 22.52 kilocalories per day per capita 111.79 kilocalories per day per capita 89.27 kilocalories per day per capita Namibia
1970s 30.58 kilocalories per day per capita 110.8 kilocalories per day per capita 80.22 kilocalories per day per capita Namibia
1980s 35.42 kilocalories per day per capita 90.92 kilocalories per day per capita 55.5 kilocalories per day per capita Namibia
1990s 40.13 kilocalories per day per capita 74.07 kilocalories per day per capita 33.94 kilocalories per day per capita Namibia
2000s 64.65 kilocalories per day per capita 103.71 kilocalories per day per capita 39.06 kilocalories per day per capita Namibia
2010s 79.62 kilocalories per day per capita 96.97 kilocalories per day per capita 17.35 kilocalories per day per capita Namibia
2020s 82.95 kilocalories per day per capita 92.78 kilocalories per day per capita 9.83 kilocalories per day per capita Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height, Cambodia or Namibia?
Cambodia, at 87.56 kilocalories per day per capita against 84.2 kilocalories per day per capita in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height between Cambodia and Namibia?
3.36 kilocalories per day per capita, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Namibia rank globally for total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height?
Cambodia ranks 144th and Namibia ranks 147th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Namibia: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-calories-from-animal-protein-vs-mean-male-height/cambodia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-calories-from-animal-protein-vs-mean-male-height/cambodia/namibia/">Cambodia vs Namibia: Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total calories from animal protein vs. mean male height
Unit
kilocalories per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Daily calorie supply of animal protein includes protein sources from animal-based foods including meat, dairy and seafood products. This is shown against mean male height in adults by year of birth.