IDA only vs South Sudan: Rural population, male
IDA only
33.4%
in 2015
South Sudan
40.5%
in 2015
IDA only rank
5th
South Sudan rank
8th
Rural population, male over time
- IDA only
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 40.5% against 33.4% in IDA only, a difference of 7.1%.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times IDA only's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
IDA only ranks 5th and South Sudan ranks 8th of 47 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA only | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 40.1% | 45.0% | 5.0% | South Sudan |
| 1990s | 38.2% | 42.4% | 4.2% | South Sudan |
| 2000s | 36.4% | 41.3% | 4.9% | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 34.0% | 40.7% | 6.7% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rural population, male, IDA only or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 40.5% against 33.4% in IDA only as of 2015.
- What is the difference in rural population, male between IDA only and South Sudan?
- 7.1%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2015.
- How do IDA only and South Sudan rank globally for rural population, male?
- IDA only ranks 5th and South Sudan ranks 8th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The United Nations Population Division's World Urbanization Prospects, published as Rural population, male (% of total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Male rural population is the percentage males who live in rural areas to total population.