IDA total vs South Sudan: Rural population, female
IDA total
32.3%
in 2015
South Sudan
40.7%
in 2015
IDA total rank
9th
South Sudan rank
9th
Rural population, female over time
- IDA total
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 40.7% against 32.3% in IDA total, a difference of 8.4%.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.3 times IDA total's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
IDA total ranks 9th and South Sudan ranks 9th of 47 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA total | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 38.8% | 45.8% | 7.0% | South Sudan |
| 1990s | 36.9% | 43.1% | 6.2% | South Sudan |
| 2000s | 35.2% | 41.8% | 6.7% | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 32.9% | 40.9% | 8.0% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rural population, female, IDA total or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 40.7% against 32.3% in IDA total as of 2015.
- What is the difference in rural population, female between IDA total and South Sudan?
- 8.4%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2015.
- How do IDA total and South Sudan rank globally for rural population, female?
- IDA total ranks 9th and South Sudan ranks 9th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The United Nations Population Division's World Urbanization Prospects, published as Rural population, female (% of total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Female rural population is the percentage of females who live in rural areas to total population.