China vs Myanmar: Ratio of female to male youth unemployment rate (% ages 15-24)
China
83.2%
in 2025
Myanmar
82.8%
in 2025
China rank
159th
Myanmar rank
161st
Ratio of female to male youth unemployment rate (% ages 15-24) over time
- China
- Myanmar
How they compare
China currently reports 83.2% against 82.8% in Myanmar, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Myanmar ahead.
China ranks 159th and Myanmar ranks 161st of 187 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.6% | 121.7% | 44.1% | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 79.7% | 121.4% | 41.7% | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 82.2% | 125.8% | 43.6% | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 83.0% | 94.9% | 11.9% | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ratio of female to male youth unemployment rate (% ages 15-24), China or Myanmar?
- China, at 83.2% against 82.8% in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ratio of female to male youth unemployment rate (% ages 15-24) between China and Myanmar?
- 0.4%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Myanmar?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do China and Myanmar rank globally for ratio of female to male youth unemployment rate (% ages 15-24)?
- China ranks 159th and Myanmar ranks 161st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, World Development Indicators database. Estimates are based on data obtained from International Labour Organization, ILOSTAT at https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/, published as Ratio of female to male youth unemployment rate (% ages 15-24) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Ratio of female to male youth unemployment is the percentage of female to male youth unemployment rates.