Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of)

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
0.6%
in 2026
South Africa
0.9%
in 2026
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
14th
South Africa rank
16th

Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of) over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • South Africa
00.20.40.60.81202120232026

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.9% against 0.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 0.3%.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.5 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 6 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 16th of 37 groups.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ratio for female members of parliaments (ratio of the proportion of), Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0.9% against 0.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2026.
What is the difference in ratio for female members of parliaments (ratio of the proportion of) between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
0.3%, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
6 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2026.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and South Africa rank globally for ratio for female members of parliaments (ratio of the proportion of)?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 16th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of women in parliament in the proportion of women in the national population with the age of eligibility as a lower bound boundary), Lower Chamber or Unicameral. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/ratio-for-female-members-of-parliaments-ratio-of-the-proportion-of-women-in-parliament-in/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/ratio-for-female-members-of-parliaments-ratio-of-the-proportion-of-women-in-parliament-in/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of women in parliament in the proportion of women in the national population with the age of eligibility as a lower bound boundary), Lower Chamber or Unicameral
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
221 places, 1,316 data points, 2021–2026
Last refreshed