Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of)

Australia and New Zealand
0.9%
in 2026
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
0.6%
in 2026
Australia and New Zealand rank
11th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
14th

Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
00.20.40.60.81202120232026

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0.9% against 0.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 0.3%.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.5 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 11th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th of 184 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ratio for female members of parliaments (ratio of the proportion of), Australia and New Zealand or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 0.9% against 0.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2026.
What is the difference in ratio for female members of parliaments (ratio of the proportion of) between Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
0.3%, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
6 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2026.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for ratio for female members of parliaments (ratio of the proportion of)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 11th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of women in parliament in the proportion of women in the national population with the age of eligibility as a lower bound boundary), Lower Chamber or Unicameral. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/ratio-for-female-members-of-parliaments-ratio-of-the-proportion-of-women-in-parliament-in/australia-and-new-zealand/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/ratio-for-female-members-of-parliaments-ratio-of-the-proportion-of-women-in-parliament-in/australia-and-new-zealand/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of women in parliament in the proportion of women in the national population with the age of eligibility as a lower bound boundary), Lower Chamber or Unicameral
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
221 places, 1,316 data points, 2021–2026
Last refreshed