Ecuador vs Sweden: Proportion of women in ministerial level positions
Ecuador
50.0%
in 2025
Sweden
52.2%
in 2025
Ecuador rank
7th
Sweden rank
6th
Proportion of women in ministerial level positions over time
- Ecuador
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 52.2% against 50.0% in Ecuador, a difference of 2.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sweden ahead.
Ecuador ranks 7th and Sweden ranks 6th of 192 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.8% | 50.0% | 25.2% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 29.4% | 52.4% | 23.0% | Sweden |
| 2020s | 39.8% | 50.6% | 10.7% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of women in ministerial level positions, Ecuador or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 52.2% against 50.0% in Ecuador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of women in ministerial level positions between Ecuador and Sweden?
- 2.2%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sweden?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Sweden rank globally for proportion of women in ministerial level positions?
- Ecuador ranks 7th and Sweden ranks 6th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Inter-Parliamentary Union. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women). Women in Politics, published as Proportion of women in ministerial level positions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Women in ministerial level positions is the proportion of women in ministerial or equivalent positions (including deputy prime ministers) in the government. Prime Ministers/Heads of Government are included when they hold ministerial portfolios. Vice-Presidents and heads of governmental or public agencies are excluded.