Laos vs Zimbabwe: Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant
Laos
30.0%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
30.1%
in 2023
Laos rank
87th
Zimbabwe rank
84th
Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant over time
- Laos
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 30.1% against 30.0% in Laos, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Laos ahead.
Laos ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 209 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.5% | 34.1% | 7.4% | Laos |
| 2010s | 34.4% | 30.7% | 3.7% | Laos |
| 2020s | 30.6% | 29.9% | 0.6% | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant, Laos or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 30.1% against 30.0% in Laos as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant between Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Laos and Zimbabwe rank globally for proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant?
- Laos ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.