Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant (%)
Costa Rica
23.3%
in 2023
Rwanda
23.9%
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
165th
Rwanda rank
163rd
Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant (%) over time
- Costa Rica
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 23.9% against 23.3% in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 165th and Rwanda ranks 163rd of 211 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.5% | 26.1% | 1.6% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 21.8% | 22.6% | 0.8% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 22.9% | 23.4% | 0.5% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant, Costa Rica or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 23.9% against 23.3% in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant between Costa Rica and Rwanda?
- 0.6%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Rwanda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Rwanda rank globally for proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant?
- Costa Rica ranks 165th and Rwanda ranks 163rd of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.