Botswana vs East Timor: Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant
Botswana
31.4%
in 2023
East Timor
30.7%
in 2023
Botswana rank
78th
East Timor rank
81st
Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant over time
- Botswana
- East Timor
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 31.4% against 30.7% in East Timor, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was East Timor ahead.
Botswana ranks 78th and East Timor ranks 81st of 209 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.9% | 37.0% | 4.1% | East Timor |
| 2010s | 30.6% | 32.2% | 1.6% | East Timor |
| 2020s | 31.1% | 30.8% | 0.3% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant, Botswana or East Timor?
- Botswana, at 31.4% against 30.7% in East Timor as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant between Botswana and East Timor?
- 0.7%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and East Timor?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and East Timor rank globally for proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant?
- Botswana ranks 78th and East Timor ranks 81st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, pregnant (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.