Uganda vs Zimbabwe: Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia
Uganda
27.2%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
27.5%
in 2023
Uganda rank
92nd
Zimbabwe rank
90th
Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia over time
- Uganda
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 27.5% against 27.2% in Uganda, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uganda ahead.
Uganda ranks 92nd and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 209 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uganda | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.6% | 30.3% | 0.6% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 24.6% | 25.4% | 0.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 26.2% | 26.4% | 0.2% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, Uganda or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 27.5% against 27.2% in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia between Uganda and Zimbabwe?
- 0.3%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Uganda and Zimbabwe rank globally for proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia?
- Uganda ranks 92nd and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.