Central and Southern Asia vs Mauritania: Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia
Central and Southern Asia
48.7%
in 2023
Mauritania
54.5%
in 2023
Central and Southern Asia rank
2nd
Mauritania rank
3rd
Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia over time
- Central and Southern Asia
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 54.5% against 48.7% in Central and Southern Asia, a difference of 5.8%.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Central and Southern Asia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Central and Southern Asia ranks 2nd and Mauritania ranks 3rd of 34 groups.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central and Southern Asia | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.1% | 55.6% | 10.5% | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 46.0% | 52.5% | 6.5% | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 48.0% | 53.7% | 5.7% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, Central and Southern Asia or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 54.5% against 48.7% in Central and Southern Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia between Central and Southern Asia and Mauritania?
- 5.8%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central and Southern Asia and Mauritania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Central and Southern Asia and Mauritania rank globally for proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia?
- Central and Southern Asia ranks 2nd and Mauritania ranks 3rd of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.