Jamaica vs Polynesia: Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant
Jamaica
21.4%
in 2023
Polynesia
21.5%
in 2023
Jamaica rank
142nd
Polynesia rank
141st
Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant over time
- Jamaica
- Polynesia
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 21.5% against 21.4% in Jamaica, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 142nd and Polynesia ranks 141st of 209 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Polynesia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.2% | 18.6% | 3.6% | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 18.4% | 18.6% | 0.1% | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 20.4% | 20.6% | 0.2% | Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant, Jamaica or Polynesia?
- Polynesia, at 21.5% against 21.4% in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant between Jamaica and Polynesia?
- 0.1%, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Polynesia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Polynesia rank globally for proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant?
- Jamaica ranks 142nd and Polynesia ranks 141st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.