Brazil vs Jamaica: Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant
Brazil
21.2%
in 2023
Jamaica
21.4%
in 2023
Brazil rank
145th
Jamaica rank
142nd
Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant over time
- Brazil
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 21.4% against 21.2% in Brazil, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 145th and Jamaica ranks 142nd of 209 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.3% | 22.2% | 5.2% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 21.0% | 18.4% | 2.6% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 20.7% | 20.4% | 0.3% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant, Brazil or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 21.4% against 21.2% in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant between Brazil and Jamaica?
- 0.2%, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Jamaica?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Jamaica rank globally for proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant?
- Brazil ranks 145th and Jamaica ranks 142nd of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.