Australia vs Guatemala: Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant
Australia
11.0%
in 2023
Guatemala
10.0%
in 2023
Australia rank
208th
Guatemala rank
209th
Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant over time
- Australia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Australia currently reports 11.0% against 10.0% in Guatemala, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guatemala ahead.
Australia ranks 208th and Guatemala ranks 209th of 209 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.0% | 14.5% | 7.5% | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 7.2% | 7.9% | 0.8% | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 10.0% | 9.1% | 0.8% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant, Australia or Guatemala?
- Australia, at 11.0% against 10.0% in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant between Australia and Guatemala?
- 1.0%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Guatemala?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Guatemala rank globally for proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant?
- Australia ranks 208th and Guatemala ranks 209th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of women aged 15-49 years with anaemia, non-pregnant (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.