Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of elected seats held by women in deliberative bodies of

Australia and New Zealand
39.2%
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
28.4%
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
5th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
8th

Proportion of elected seats held by women in deliberative bodies of over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
010203040202020222025

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 39.2% against 28.4% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 10.8%.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th of 23 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of elected seats held by women in deliberative bodies of, Australia and New Zealand or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 39.2% against 28.4% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in proportion of elected seats held by women in deliberative bodies of between Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
10.8%, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
6 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for proportion of elected seats held by women in deliberative bodies of?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th of 23 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of elected seats held by women in deliberative bodies of local government (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of elected seats held by women in deliberative bodies of. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-elected-seats-held-by-women-in-deliberative-bodies-of-local-government/australia-and-new-zealand/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-elected-seats-held-by-women-in-deliberative-bodies-of-local-government/australia-and-new-zealand/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of elected seats held by women in deliberative bodies of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of elected seats held by women in deliberative bodies of local government (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
35 places, 224 data points, 2015–2025
Last refreshed