Nauru vs Suriname: Share of women of reproductive age who have anemia
Nauru
22.5%
in 2023
Suriname
22.2%
in 2023
Nauru rank
120th
Suriname rank
123rd
Share of women of reproductive age who have anemia over time
- Nauru
- Suriname
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 22.5% against 22.2% in Suriname, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Nauru ranks 120th and Suriname ranks 123rd of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.4% | 23.7% | 4.3% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 19.6% | 19.5% | 0.2% | Nauru |
| 2020s | 21.6% | 21.3% | 0.3% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of women of reproductive age who have anemia, Nauru or Suriname?
- Nauru, at 22.5% against 22.2% in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of women of reproductive age who have anemia between Nauru and Suriname?
- 0.3%, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Suriname?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Suriname rank globally for share of women of reproductive age who have anemia?
- Nauru ranks 120th and Suriname ranks 123rd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Observatory / World Health Statistics - World Health Organization (WHO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of women of reproductive age who have anemia. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49) with anemia. Anemia is a condition that develops when your blood lacks enough healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin.