Nauru vs Suriname: Prevalence of anemia in women of reproductive age aged 15 29
Nauru
22.5
in 2023
Suriname
22.2
in 2023
Nauru rank
120th
Suriname rank
123rd
Prevalence of anemia in women of reproductive age aged 15 29 over time
- Nauru
- Suriname
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 22.5 against 22.2 in Suriname, a difference of 0.3.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Nauru ranks 120th and Suriname ranks 123rd of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.45 | 23.72 | 4.27 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 19.63 | 19.48 | 0.15 | Nauru |
| 2020s | 21.6 | 21.27 | 0.325 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia in women of reproductive age aged 15 29, Nauru or Suriname?
- Nauru, at 22.5 against 22.2 in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia in women of reproductive age aged 15 29 between Nauru and Suriname?
- 0.3, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Suriname?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Suriname rank globally for prevalence of anemia in women of reproductive age aged 15 29?
- Nauru ranks 120th and Suriname ranks 123rd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Prevalence of anemia in women of reproductive age aged 15 29. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.